> > My experience was that Mozilla M18 was not nearly as stable as > > Netscape 4.75 and I removed it from my system. > > i have found its certainly more of a pig, and its interface is very > sluggish, it does tend to be less stable too, but only for certain > sites. i think for most people sticking with netscape 4.75 is > probably the best thing for now.
the stability is ok for a beta software, but it's far too slow, cause it loads an entire new operating system... this may be nice, but in the moment i would only like to use the nice gecko engine for compatibility tests and some sites that can't be rendered properly with khtml. getting used to konqueror, i don't like the slow mozilla interface any more. i tried galeon but it didn't fit my needs. i heared of skipstone and really really want to try it. but unfortunatly there is only a woody version :( is there any way to get skipstone for a potato system? -Daniel > having said that, netscape 6 is still far worse then mozilla, don't be > fooled by AOL/Netscape calling it `final gold release'.
