Hi, * Daniel Barclay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-08 21:46]: >Colin Watson wrote: >> ... >> You could always follow his Mail-Followup-To: header, which is designed >> for exactly this purpose: >> >> Mail-Followup-To: Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >But how would you propose I do that? Do a "View Source" on every >message?
Yes, if your MUA forces you to do so. However, I think the better
approach is to lean back a moment and think about it: Why would anyone
want to have the reply twice? Is there any technical reason why you
would receive one mail but not the other?
>(By the way, where is that message header defined? I just searched
>through all the IETF RfCs but couldn't find it.)
Whatever the RFCs say, I think the motivation is clear: Don't send the
mail twice. It is highly unlikely that anyone would post on a list but
not be able to read it, so one reply is enough.
Thorsten
--
It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.
- Albert Einstein
msg29489/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
