Kristian Rink wrote: > wmwaisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03.11.00: > > > It would probably be better to intall and try the two ones. > > > > If you don t have enough place on your hard disk, you will have to > > choose one of them. > > > > As far as I'm concerned KDE1.2 is necessary for me as I need > > kdevelop ( an Integrated Development tool IDE ) and gnome for tools > > such as gnotepad+ ( a good editor ). > > > > If you can, try the two ones. > > > > Right... Personally, until now I was preferring GNOME because of the strange > licensing mix-up with QT library, but now that this stuff is GPL'ed, I > checked it out once again and, well, KDE2 seems pretty good... > > Besides this, if You`re not wanting to run those two "huge" packages on your > box, you might want to check out > > www.xfce.org > > to get the xfce desktop environment which (same as gimp and gnome) is > gtk-based, more or less lightweight and pretty fast and (if needed) provides > integration for GNOME apps... :))) > > Regards, > Kristian > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________________________________ > 1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de > [EMAIL PROTECTED], 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Yes, xfce is small, and fast. I use only the apps from gnome-1.2 and kde-2, but the window-manager is xfce. cu armin
