on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:28:59AM +0200, Robert Waldner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 21:44:21 +1300, "C. Falconer" writes:

<...>

> >At 06:39 AM 10/25/00 +0200, you wrote:
> >>The system is an up-to-date potato
> >>Linux cruncher 2.2.15 #1 Thu Jun 1 10:47:16 EST 2000 i686 unknown
> >
> >Its not up-to-date if its not running the latest kernel in the range - 
> >2.2.17 at the moment :)
> 
> Hmm, the war uptime vs. kernel is usually won by uptime here ;-) , but 
>  all the other packages are up-to-date as of yesterday.
> 
> (That´s why I´m running 2.0.3[6,8] kernels on some other boxes)

2.2.17 is recommended to fix a set of root-level exploits (local,
IIRC) in the 2.2.9 (?) - 2.2.16 series.  Prior to 2.2.9, there were,
IIRC, some memory issues or other random bugs.  I'm running 2.2.17 at
home and 2.2.4pre8 at work.

The 2.0.3[678] series is actually pretty good, and if you don't need
features added in later kernels, is probably a good choice for a secure
box.  If you've got any external exposure or foreign users on your box,
I'd tidy that up.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>     http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
 Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.                    http://www.opensales.org
  What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?      There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/        http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0

Attachment: pgpB9wJekwqKZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to