Only use kernel 2.4 on test systems which you can afford to have go down if something goes wrong. The current 2.4 versions have the "pre" on their names explicitly because of their beta nature -- Things might work, but there's no guarentee.
On a production system which must "just work", 2.2.17 is a better choice of kernel. On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Mark Phillips wrote: > Hanno Böttcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I want to install a Debian and I'm asking myself what Kernel whould be > > the best choice? E.g. anyone tried the 2.4 ? Is it making Problems? > > I am using 2.4.0-test9 and it seems fine so far. It allows me to use > LVM and ReiserFS, both of which are great! > > Cheers, > > Mark. > > -- > _/~~~~~~~~\___/~~~~~~\____________________________________________________ > ____/~~\_____/~~\__/~~\__________________________Mark_Phillips____________ > ____/~~\_____/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ____/~~\HE___/~~\__/~~\APTAIN_____________________________________________ > ____/~~\______/~~~~~~\____________________________________________________ > __________________________________________________________________________ > "They told me I was gullible ... and I believed them!" > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > >
