Very obvious indeed... Especially when a guy has never used RedHack to know what libraries were in 6.1. I'd have to guess that's where the name came from.
Thanks! On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Colin Watson wrote: > Alec Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/local/frontpage/version4.0/bin$ ldd fpsrvadm.exe > > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x40016000) > > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40043000) > > libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 => not found > > libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40047000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40065000) > > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > > > >How can I go about satisfying this dependancy on a Potato system? I've got > >libstd++2.8, libstdc++2.9, and libstd++2.10 installed at present. > > On this potato system, that library's in libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1. > (Intuitive name, huh?) > > -- > Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > >
