> > Monday, August 21, 2000, 11:35:05 AM, Mark wrote: > > > I am somewhat tempted to ask why if you want to keep two sets of mail > > > separate sets of mail you find it imperative to handle them both with > > > one instance of a program. > > > > Convenience. There is no good reason not to, really. Why should I > have > > to use two when one is perfectly acceptable? The distinction is that the > > program itself is able to handle the split whereas most cannot. > > I would be rather surprised if the new KMail couldn't handle things as you > want (though I haven't fully tried it), however, this will not help you if > you do not use X. I think that it is slightly unreasonable to expect to be > able to keep two email accounts separate on your local machine and yet > demand to be able to access both through a single instance of your MUA. To > me, it would seem far more logical to access both local mail boxes through, > if not separate accounts, then through separate instances of your MUA.
Sorry, I'm pretty certain I mean mail client instead of MUA in the above paragraph. Matthew
