On 04-Aug-2000 Christophe TROESTLER wrote: > Hi the list, > > I apologize if that is a little bit off topic but I am a bit puzzled > and I know there are experts on this list. I would like an > explanation on why the two "for" below give different results. >
my comment here is -- use better coding style. '1.' -> '1.0', etc. Why initialize x twice? or even in the loop? Why do all the work in the loop parts anyway? Makes it harder to find the actual logic.
