It's buggy, you can only "share" mp3's, I often try to download a few songs only to get "error" so I can only assume that their database isn't kept updated very often at all. I can only compare it to gnutella under linux, which is also buggy but I like how it's distributed and not limited to mp3 files. Under windoze, I prefer Scour Exchange because I can share any type of file, it's more configurable, and the database not only seems to be right nore often, but it's much faster.
Hope that helps. I'm nothing of an expert with any of these. * Krzys Majewski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000803 13:40] wrote: > Out of curiousity, what don't you like about napster? > One thing that strikes me as potentially lame is that you can only > upload my files while I'm running the client..but I guess that's the > windows way (howbout a napsterd with sophisticated access control > etc.?) Napster struck me as pretty effective but then again my > expectations were low.. > chris > > > Not that I think napster does it's job particularly well but I thought > > people should know that it is up. Of course, there's always gnutella for > > file sharing-- of open source software, of course. Heh. > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > -- -Grant ````````````````````````````````````oio````````````````````````````````````` "See them clamber, these nimble apes! They clamber over one another, and thus scuffle into the mud and the abyss." --Nietzsche ````````````````````````````````````ioi`````````````````````````````````````
