On 2 Aug 2000, John Hasler wrote: > Paul Seelig writes: > > This functionality is given by the "apropos(1)" command. "man man" still > > describes "man -k" though. I guess this counts as a bug... > > Why? 'man -k' works fine. > You are right, i had an alias "man -P less" for man which resulted in a not working "man -k". Sorry for the confusion.
Cheers, P. *8^)
