* Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bladeenc is faster but not as high quality as lame (YMMV). I > have been using bladeenc, but switched to lame for low bitrate > encodings.
The latest lame beta (3.83) is quite fast.
* Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bladeenc is faster but not as high quality as lame (YMMV). I > have been using bladeenc, but switched to lame for low bitrate > encodings.
The latest lame beta (3.83) is quite fast.