Quoting Kenward Vaughan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 10:52:09AM +0100, David Wright wrote: > > Quoting Kenward Vaughan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Diald is my nemesis... Various attempts to get it working have failed to > ... > > Apologies if I pick up the wrong end of the stick, but diald just > > automates the PPP link for you? So I'm not sure why you want to > > make the peer (your ISP?) authorise itself to you. In other words, > > just as your ppp provider script has noauth in it, diald needs the > > same treatment (however that is configured). > ... > > OK, but running with noauth gives a more simplified pppd message saying: > > LCP terminated by peer
That suggests that LCP protocol is being exchanged because the peer (other end) is saying go away. > so I'm at a loss. The link lasts for 15-20 seconds. The logs show bytes > sent, but none received. (I don't know what sort of bytes are being logged. i.e. is it useful bytes as opposed to housekeeping bytes.) I think you should add "debug" to your options file (either the master one or a provider one; whatever works) which will make the log capture more interesting things like: pppd: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x2b9932af> <pcomp> <accomp>] pppd: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x2b9932af> <pcomp> <accomp>] pppd: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0x2b9932af] pppd: sent [CHAP Challenge id=0x1 <f...f>, name = "foo"] pppd: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0x3 "peer refused to authenticate"] pppd: LCP terminated by peer (peer refused to authenticate) pppd: sent [LCP TermAck id=0x3] Cheers, -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1908 653 739 Fax: +44 1908 655 151 Snail: David Wright, Earth Science Dept., Milton Keynes, England, MK7 6AA Disclaimer: These addresses are only for reaching me, and do not signify official stationery. Views expressed here are either my own or plagiarised.
