Previously Chip Salzenberg wrote: > Actually, from what I've been told, rpm has at least one serious > technical flaw: The order of execution for pre-install and > post-install scripts is nonsensical for upgrades.
I wouldn't call it nonsensical, but the way dpkg does it is definitely more robust. I need to take another close look at how rpm and dpkg differ in this respect anyway, so if people are interested in the little details I might be willing to write a little comparison about it.. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
pgpIiusHQV4L7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
