"Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have been keeping my system updated to unstable, >and for a few weeks dselect is showing several >suspicious obsolete packages: > >Section Package Version >======= ============= ======== >devel g++ 2.95.2-9 >devel gcc 2.95.2-9 >base libstdc++2.1 2.95.2-9 >base libreadlineg 2.1-12 > >I had noticed libreadlineg there for even longer, >and was never able to delete it (because it marked >for deletion lots of packages that I wanted), but >it didn't really bother me that much.
That's probably libreadlineg2 - it'll be too wide for the column in dselect. It *is* in the oldlibs section, but a lot of packages still depend on it. >Now, gcc and g++, that's another story. How can they >be marked as obsolete? What's more intriguing, I have >been navigating around www.debian.org, and was able >to find gcc (egcc) for the stable distribution, but >there was no such package for unstable! What gives? >I find it hard to believe gcc is disappearing from >unstable? Any hints? I'm told this was caused by the last upload of gcc et al being to the frozen distribution only; there's a bug somewhere which means that such uploads end up deleting the package from unstable altogether. People who need the package can get it from potato, I suppose, and at the moment a lot of the developers are concentrating on getting that distribution out the door before worrying about unstable. With any luck this'll be fixed either at the next release of gcc or when the gcc people have some time free from potato. >Please replay by e-mail as well as to the list. Thanks, Cc'd. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
