Felix Natter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > "Colin Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I wrote in the other day detailing the overwhelming amount of erradic > > behaviour my new system (K62-550,128MB,16M Vid) <SNIP> > this is most probably not a compiler problem. > When I tried to overclock a Celeron 300A, I also had these problems - > only when compiling. It seems that gcc is "exercising" the system the most.
I agree. I've seen very strange results from overclocking. Just for fun try UNDERclocking the processor. This *shouldn't* cause any damage, but YMMV. Should it pass after doing this, you may have a remarked processor... JMHO, Ron -- Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home: <http://www.farrer.net> Bellingham Linux Users Group: <http://www.blug.org> Alpha Linux Orginization: <http://www.alphalinux.org>
