A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 07:20:54AM -0800, aphro wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Onno wrote: > > > > Onno >2.2.13 and 2.2.14 are lokking good, is there anyone on this > > Onno >list that find them unstable? > > Onno > > > > > i avoided 2.2.13 it was just a bug fixer from 2.2.12/.11 .14 has been ok > > for me so far, although i have it installed on a BP6 that crashes on a > > weekly basis as it is (.11 crashed on a daily basis) > > 2.2.13 is evil. it throughly and completely and repeatedly ruins > filesystems. > > (i know not for everyone, but if you want to be scared into getting > rid of it i'll send the 64000+ byte output of fsck as it dumped 2/3 of > my / filesystem into /lost+found, to do `corrupted blocks' or some > such, then compare that to the changelog for 2.2.14 fixing a `obscure > block corruption bug'.... )
Ouch. I've always wondered how people find these problems - I've been using 2.2.x from 2.2.0 straight through 2.2.14 without a single problem on three machines with totally different hardware. I've even been using 2.3.x since 2.3.31, and haven't seen any of the problems I've seen reports on. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] "There are two things that are infinite; Human stupidity and the universe. And I'm not sure about the universe." - Albert Einstein