On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Marc Sherman wrote: > Does /tmp have to be physically located on the boot > partition, or can it be a symlink to /var/tmp on another > partition? I've seen conflicting statements in different
I've been using /tmp -> /var/tmp for some time now, and never noticed any problems. > and others say that the boot process needs temp space, and > uses /tmp for that purpose, so it needs to be on the boot > partition. Does anyone have conclusive proof (ie: a working A quick look on /etc/rcS.d shows that nothing seems to use /tmp before S35mountall.sh is called. grep shows that only S55bootmisc.sh uses /tmp directly. I am not _sure_ none of the programs called by the scripts use /tmp, though. But as I said, everything seems to be working fine here. If anything before S35mountall.sh uses /tmp, this is a potentially severe bug. It's standard practice to have /tmp as a separate partition when you can spare the disk space, and this partition would not be available before S35mountall.sh is run. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
