Hello! IMHO, encoding with more than 128 kbps makes sense. I use bladeenc, which offers much better sound quality at 160 or 256 kbps. At 128, I can hear the blips clearly (maybe because of BladeEnc).
Kind Regards, Stephan Hachinger ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 9:55 PM Subject: Re: recommend mp3 encoder > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Thomas Keusch wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 03:55:55PM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote: > > > > > I'm looking for the highest compression quality possible. I don't care > > > about speed (nor about interface) at all. Is there anything compareable > > > to Fraunhoffer encoder under win32 for Linux? > > > > > > I'll be encoding wavs into 256 KBps mp3's. > > AFAIK encoding with mor then 128kBps doesn't make sense, since there is no > significant change in quality anymore... > > Martin > > - -- > Where do you want to go today? - As far from Redmond as possible! > > For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: 2.6.3ia > Charset: noconv > > iQCVAwUBODmt4rCGSMW7I2etAQH8AwP/apwHnq0iruGDQkGLpAV25oOJl817HG+i > zHM9F8NSVXcYLMLSDUGrWNRLblNSvFAgJP51dVHx7DwRKJyM5At6DUY0zg7KZypV > /209yINlzG5pGf/a0Jmq51rnBnKg1fgj/0/P1M2UufNwNZqeZTjiad4NECVjvlbN > ONHcQ1SKNoE= > =UOQ1 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
