My apologies, as I was not as clear as I should have been. Load balancing is
not what I meant, I would merely like to assign two IP addresses that are on
the same subnet to each NIC in the server. To be honest whether or not 1 NIC
can handle the load is not my concern, I want to see if it is possible to
have 2 IP addresses that are on the same subnet assigned to each NIC. The
end goal is to split out the services to each interface. Please let me know
if more information/clarity is needed.

----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen A. Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jason Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple IP Addressing


> On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Jason Taylor wrote:
>
> > I am new to the Debian world and am working on a new in house system
that
> > has 2 3com 10/100 PCI NIC's in it. I got the system to find the NIC's
okay
> > now I am wondering how I configure /etc/init.d/network file to load
balance
> > between the NIC's. I added a seperate script in /etc/init.d/network for
eth1
> > but it overwrites eth0 default route which is destination - default
> > gateway - 131.107.2.15 genmask - 0.0.0.0 flags - UG metric - 1 ref - 0
use -
> > 0 iface - eth1. I would think that I need a default route for both
NIC's?
> > TIA..
> >
> > below is the output of ifconfig -a
> >
> > lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
> >           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Bcast:127.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
> >           UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3584  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:278 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >           TX packets:278 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           Collisions:0
> >
> > eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:DA:08:5D:09
> >           inet addr:131.107.2.216  Bcast:131.107.2.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
> >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:845 errors:47 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:71
> >           TX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           Collisions:0
> >           Interrupt:11 Base address:0xec00
> >
> > eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:04:73:C6:A9
> >           inet addr:131.107.2.217  Bcast:131.107.2.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
> >           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >           RX packets:436 errors:47 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:71
> >           TX packets:367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >           Collisions:0
> >           Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe880
> >
>
> I don't think what you are trying to do makes any sense. It seems that you
> are trying to connect both NICs to the same Ethernet segment. This, and
> your words "load balance" seem to imply that you think that 1 NIC can't
> keep up with the traffic load on that Ethernet segment that is destined
> for your machine. I think this is mistaken, 1 NIC should easily be able to
> keep up with the traffic of the one Ethernet segment to which it is
> connected. Second, I'm not aware of any capability within the Linux IP
> layer to "load balance" between network interfaces connected to the same
> network. This is partly why the addition of the second default route for
> eth1 overwrites the default route for eth0.
>
> I think it might help if you explained what your end goal is.
>
>

Reply via email to