On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 01:11:34PM -0500, Ian Stirling wrote: > "E.L. Meijer (Eric)" wrote: > > > I think it is a bad idea to call it `debian gimp'. If you do that you > > suggest that debian has a heavily modified, enhanced version of gimp. > > If I were one of the gimp developers I wouldn't like it if someone (say > > Corel) would take it, remove some plugins, and then tack their name on > > it (`Corel gimp'??). > > > > Eric > > They are entitled to if it's gpl software but it would > be rude and inconsiderate. What about 'debian-gimp-lite'?
Why does Debian have to be in there? Why not just `gimp-lite'? -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
