On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Martin Fluch wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Ingo Reimann wrote:
>
> > does anyone know, what happened with lovely gimp?
> >
> > Just now, it is not useable, due to segfaults in script-fu. Bugreport has
> > been submitted (#48840)
> >
> > I need it...
>
> There is the same scheme for version numbering with gimp than with the
> kernel. If the second number of the version is even, than it is the stable
> version of gimp (e.g. 1.0.4 is stable), but when it is odd (like 1.1.10)
> then it is a developer version which is more or less unstable. Your bug
> report is about gimp1.1, so there is no wonder about this. Fall back to
> gimp1.0.4, which is the current one in potato (it runs perfectly stable on
> my potato box), and wait with the upgrading till the next stable gimp will
> be released in the future.
>
Thanks for that hint, but i have been using the unstable releases of gimp
from the beginning on. Unstable and unusable is something quite different,
don't you agree?
Ingo
----------------------------------------------------------------
I. Reimann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inst. fuer Angew. Physik +49 251 83-33527 (fon)
Correnstr. 2-4 +49 251 83-33513 (fax)
D-48149 Muenster
Germany
----------------------------------------------------------------
