Vincent Renardias wrote: > I've just compiled the lastest GNOME release (October GNOME) for slink > > deb http://www.debian.org/~vincent/ unstable main Joop Stakenborg wrote: > All you packages end in -0.slink.0_i386.deb > Does this mean this is a unstable slink october-gnome? Vincent Renardias wrote: > As long as it hasn't been more widely tested, it certainly won't be > considered as stable... I think the point is that users will presume that the `unstable' path in the apt-get URL refers to potato and not to `untested'. Why not rename your "unstable" directory to something like "slink-compat" ? Peter
- October GNOME for slink. Vincent Renardias
- Re: October GNOME for slink. Joop Stakenborg
- Re: October GNOME for slink. Vincent Renardias
- Re: October GNOME for sli... Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira
- Re: October GNOME for... Vincent Renardias
- Re: October GNOME for sli... Peter S Galbraith
- Re: October GNOME for... Vincent Renardias
- Re: October GNOME for slink. Martin Weinberg
- Re: October GNOME for slink. Daniel Ferrante
- Re: October GNOME for sli... Nick Phillips
- AHA2940U2W... Daniel Ferrante
- Re: AHA2940U2W..... Gregory T. Norris
- Re: AHA2940U... Daniel Ferrante
- Re: AHA2... David Blackman
- Re: AHA2... Mirek Kwasniak
- Re: AHA2940U2W..... Onno

