On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 10:15:29PM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 11:11:37AM +1000, > Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - adequate support for GPG (could be better IMHO). > > Why do you think mutt's support of gpg is only adequate? I use it on a > daily basis with no problems.
See bugs#47833 for instance. This is only minor, but still is inconvenient. The biggest problem was with selecting a users public key when encrypting a message. It wouldn't list the user names I wanted to see. I filled this as bug #39793, but that has since been closed. I assume that this means the problem should be fixed in potato, but haven't checked. FYI, this is from the bug report: [...] Now it gives me a menu of keys to choose from: 1 ? 1024/0x59EF33BD RSA es Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2 ? 1024/0x59EF33BD RSA es Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 ? 1024/0x70148CF9 RSA es Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Note: It key 1 and 2 are both the same key. It doesn't display the 2nd UID of this key, which is [EMAIL PROTECTED], the desired one. (Look up my key on the Developers key ring if you are not sure). PGP would display this instead: 1 + 1024/0x59EF33BD RSA es Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2 + 1024/0x59EF33BD RSA es Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 + 1024/0x70148CF9 RSA es Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If I try to encrypt the message without signing, it comes up with the prompt: Enter keyID for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: but won't accept anything I type - I have to sign the message as well for it to work. [...] -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
