> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 15:03:54 -0500 > From: "Eric Gillespie, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Bruce Z. Lysik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: A GnuPG package for stable? > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C; micalg=pgp-md5; > protocol="application/pgp-signature" > > I have gpg as well as a few other potato packages compiled for slink at > http://www.pobox.com/~epg/debian > > -- > Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please, don't take this the wrong way ...but, HOW CAN ANYONE TRUST a non official binary package of a security program? I'm not saying you're not acting in good faith here, but one SHOULD ONLY RELY either in Debian (or other known distros/distributors) binary packages, source or binaries from the official GnuPG site, or any other WELL KNOWN source of distribution. Else, we may think of this security program as a potential hole in security. So, either build it yourself from the sources, or patiently wait for an official binary release for your system. Kind Regards, -- Horacio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Valencia - ESPAÑA
