On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 17:03:50 -0700 (PDT), Ernest Johanson wrote: >Well, I'm not sure but again I have a question. What about things like >MinSpareServers, MaxSpareServers and KeepAlive? If there aren't enough >spare children running, then some requests may drop. Subsequent requests >find some graphics in the local cache and then request the ones that >didn't make it last time. Dunno, but take a look.
Again I doubt this could be the reason. Remember that if I access the server internally *everything* is being displayed, i.e. no inline graphics are dropped, and this way I have the highest thruput and the lowest latency, compared to accesses from the internet. Anyway, here's the relevant excerpts: ================= 8x ===================== MaxKeepAliveRequests 100 KeepAliveTimeout 15 MinSpareServers 3 MaxSpareServers 10 StartServers 3 MaxClients 50 MaxRequestsPerChild 30 ================= 8x ===================== I'm still clueless as to what could be the reason... :-( Thanks for your help, Ralf -- Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~. http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ The Choice /V\ of a GNU /( )\ Generation ^^-^^
