On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Paul Miller wrote:
> Sergey V Kovalyov wrote: > > > > b) is there a sensible replacement for ghostview that is functionally > > similar the windows' GSview ? > > > I much prefer the 'gv' package over 'ghostview'. It is another front end > to 'ghostscript' which has a much better feel and look IMHO. You might > give it a shot. I prefere gv too, but it does not eliminate the problem. I spoke about ghostview in the generalized sense (gv, kghostview, ghostview). The all use ghostscript as a back end and produce identically horrible output. Sergey.
