%% Jan Vroonhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jv> Contrary to popular opinion the FSF is _not_ the sole copyright jv> holder of GNU Emacs. The copyright to FSF Emacs is jointly held by jv> the FSF and the Electrotechnical Laboratory (which is the Japanese jv> government research institute that is responsible for Mule).
How do you determine this? All the copyright statements I saw in 20.4 after a quick check were merely by the FSF, including such docs as etc/DISTRIB. That's quite fascinating if true. I wonder what the story is behind this; RMS has never been willing to do this before, and for him to bend like this simply to integrate what is, quite frankly, not a very good implementation of i18n (IMO, of course) is interesting to say the least. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Management Development "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.
