"J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" wrote: > If you want to have your C++ code portable to many systems and compiler > versions, you have to be quite conservative in your choice of C++ subset. > The mozilla folks have a writeup on this: > http://www.mozilla.org/docs/tplist/catBuild/portable-cpp.html Hmm. This site looks like "dont use C++ use C instead". I don't think that it is useful to write code the way any f*ing compiler can understand it. In my opinion some Standards are holy (Amen). Use the C++ standard as defined in the draft. All compilers will understand it sooner or (many of them) later. :( No templates, namespaces, mutable, ..... not much left of C++ and the most common filename extension for C++ in UNIX is still cc.
The Link to http://www.dinkumware.com/htm_cpl/ you supplied is fine. Not as good as my book but very useful when I'm to lazy to stand up and fetch it ;) Bernhard -- __ ___ // ) ___--"" "-. \ |,"( /`--"" `. Bernhard Rieder \/ o \ ( _.-. ,'" ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |\" /`. \ , / | | \ ' .'`.; | | \.______________________________ _-'.' | |--..,,,\_ \________------------"""""""""""" '''" _-'.' ___"- ) '''" '''---~""
