> > Andrew; > > I suppose that my first thought would be to BIOS differences... > Have you already checked for "memory holes" and "shadow memory"?
Yep, did that check, everything was ok. > > What is the size difference between the two kernels? > The 2.0.36 is 406K, 2.2.10 is 495K. Both kernels worked before. > While I am ignorant of the majority of the differences between 2.0- > and 2.2- kernels is there any chance that a change in the handling of > the disk geometry by the BIOS affects the 2.2 kernel where the 2.0 > might ignore the change? That would be a good possibility. I'll try recompiling the kernel with all the BIOS/mb fixes in it, see if that helps. NExt would be to use a different mboard. Andrew
