-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 09:21:17 -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
>I think what he's saying, Wayne, is that he's doing a reply instead of
>generating a new message so he won't have to remember the list address
>or put it in his address book. "Trying" would be what he didn't do.
>Hard to believe, I know. At least he confessed. We won't have to bring
>out the soft cushions this time.
Is it just me, or is this whole thread pointless? When I read the
original rant I just chuckled, shook my head and deleted it. Why? Because
it is counterpoint to another peeve people have. That one is when a thread
moves away from what the subject states and noone changes it. I don't think
people reply to any ol' message to create a new message, but are replying to
a message and were courtious enough to change the subject and now someone is
bitching about it.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN5dMJ3pf7K2LbpnFEQKjsACgkShPODZf1ifiSUo7sgnqNUrASbsAn2OP
3FSfoP+Rf9iPhGZBgnvUIRBq
=aAZ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
