On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:35:54AM +0100, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote: > On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 12:25:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 11:43:27PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski > > wrote: > > > > > Sorry, but OE doesn't deserve to be called a email client. You
> > Placing the cursor at the top of the message is the right thing > > to do - you're only going to have to go back up deleting text > > otherwise. > Yes, but OE inserts a blank line at the top of the message, and > places only `-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --' as the quote line. Then, to > compound things further, it puts your signature *above* the quoted > message. Oh, indeed - the signature placement is just plain wrong, and the quote line is bad too (although not insurmontable, and more informative than some). It just seems silly to pull it up for faults that don't exist (and this cursor placment seems to be the favourite) when there are so many real ones to complain about. > > Which also starts you off at the top. > I wouldn't know, I'm perfectly happy with mutt and vim (which also > starts off at the top). How can you live without the wellspring of informed and reasoned discussion that is Usenet?! -- Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness) http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ EUFS http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/
pgpVIakWeJuFW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
