On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:33:16AM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Hugh Saunders wrote: > > > yeah, mine had the heat sink and fan from a 486, fitted nicely. > > It was stable [even when overclocked] running woody with an smp kernel. > > Died because i added a graphics card before it had powered down properly > > [user-error, not hardware failure!] > > This board is actually one of the more stable ones we have around, now > that it's been fitted with the pentium heatsink that is on it. I haven't > done any capacitor mods on it though. > > It's running NT 4.0 Enterprise, I regularly see 3-4 months uptime with no > problem, except when the MCSE gets to it. > > > > ASUS P4B533, but management is "it works, why replace it?" > > i'll have the bp6 when you get it replaced ;-) > > I'm hoping we don't end up with a Compaq/HP P.O.S replacing it, but > that's what the MCSE wants. so its a matter of time then?
> I'd rather have known good hardware, that if something goes wrong, I > don't have to wait a few hours minimum for a Compaq minimum wage tech to > come out and fix it. agree, is good to have tech support but wouldnt be confident about a system i couldnt at least have a go at my self. hugh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
