> Hi! > "Luiz Otavio L. Zorzella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to know what are the good packages for > > ICQ people use in Debian. > Timothy Hospedales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have tried most of the ICQ clones > > available and I find that micq is the most stable! > Perhaps, but I have micq Version 0.3.1 and it lacks > chat support. I don't know if any newer version > has. > add|ct|on <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > personally i prefer either kxicq > Is it an ICQ clone for KDE? > > or licq (for x, anyway). i've had no problems > > with either losing messages or userlist entrieson > > me....yet. > I also have LICQ version 0.43, and I loss messages > that comes from email (You know that anybody can > send an email to an ICQ user at > <uin>@pager.mirabilis.com). Perhaps a newer version > has fixed it. Does anybody know? I think it is related to the fact that e-mail messages requires the v5 protocol, which licq doesn't implement yet. (I don't use licq anymore, I may be wrong) This is because e-mail messages can be longer than the pre-v5 characters limit. Anyone caring more than I =) about licq is welcomed to investigate and report to the maintainer. > With LICQ you have chat, and you can see the colors, > but you aren't able to colour the screen you are > typing it. But I don't mind. GnomeICU is doing most what ICQ98 was doing on windows. Chat (no more than 2 though, but that's the next update I think), File Transfert (alpha state. Works but crashed the client afterwise. (GnomeICU v0.64)) messages, UINs (beta state, has some troubles with v5 clients). >From past personnal experience, I'd say gnomeICU and licq are the two most advanced ICQ clients for linux, and ICQ-Java the most 'stable' and feature-full. (Mark that stable with a great grain of salt) Christian Lavoie [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 947212