>> "DM" == Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DM> Is this a bug with either of the packages? If so, which one? xdm DM> and wdm seem to co-exist well as regards to things like depends.
The thing is, that you could manage :0 with xdm, :1 with wdm and XDMCP
with gdm or such. So the packages don't conflict in a traditional
sense. But looks like all of them try to manage :0 and therefore there
is this mess.
Ciao,
Martin
