Kenneth Scharf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | There already has been feedback on the web (and this list) about this. | It does appear that a great effort was made to pull all the stops out | in configuring NT, and little care was given to setting up Linux. IE: | use of a kerenl with know network bugs, none of apache's optimizations | turned on... | | --- Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Kenneth Scharf wrote: | > | > > Well it finally happened. Microsoft has paid | > someone off to fix a | > > benchmark showing that Windows NT is actually | > better than linux. | > > | > > | > http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html | > | > This doesn't look good. Are the results cooked or | > flawed, or the | > configuration not optimal? Or is it true?
You guys need to read your Slashdot (http://slashdot.org). I've heard that this particular "benchmark" was commissioned by Microsoft. Anyone who pays attention to a benchmark commissioned by one of the interested parties deserves what they get. Gary
