On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Gary Singleton wrote:
> With all the discussion about these two over the last
> couple of days I have to ask what the advantage of
> gs-aladdin is (if any)? I read the FAQ on Wisconsin's
> home for Ghostscript and in section 1.3 it states that
> the only difference is in licensing. The only
> difference there is apparently that the Aladdin
> license prohibits _any_ commercial distribution. If
> this is correct, why would someone choose to run
> gs-aladdin over gs? I _must_ be missing something.
>
The conversion ps->pdf works fine in gs-aladdin (5.50),
and sometimes gives very ugly results in gs (5.10) (particularly
in eps graphics).
Wojtek Zabolotny
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
