-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999 14:43:46 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>The fact that these things are useless to you is seperate to their size.
>There are small, useless attachments just as much as their are large,
>useful ones. I don't think we should ignore large, useful attachments just
>because large, useless ones exist.
As the size of an attachment increases, the value of it decresses.
There comes a point where one should not send the attachment, period, and
use other means which have been available for years.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBNwiU1Xpf7K2LbpnFEQL8ewCbBfYmQx2PBw3qegDuF7Xgcbem/W0AoL5Y
k1oAPPlTY3FFONKFkZJTgu5u
=Ehpo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
