On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, buns wrote:
> " Raymond A. Ingles" wrote:
> > > The address seem to indicate that the intruder originates from Malaysia.
> >
> > As does yours.
>
> Rest assured that mine does.
BTW, I meant to put a smiley after that "As does yours" part, sorry.
> I sincerely think that the intruder does not appreciate the magnitude of the
> penal
> consequences of his/her actions.
Perhaps so, but that's not always an excuse. I'd hope that the sysadmins
and prosecutors would have some judgement about when and how to press
chagers, and when not to.
> elsewhere) and it is up to Don Erickson to take up the matter with the
> relevant
> authority ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
This I agree with, too. I don't mean to seem hostile, but just because a
cracker doesn't physically invade someone's home or business, it does not
mean that cracking shouldn't be viewed as about the same as burglary.
Still, I appreciate that not everyone views it the same way.
The old-school MIT hackers made plenty of information available about
lockpicking. They didn't encourage larceny, just creative exploration and
avoidance of bureaucratic hassles. They often extended this notion to,
shall we say, creative exploration of computer systems. I can understand
this, but no legitimate exploratory hacker would mess with "ls", "du" and
use smurf attack programs.
Sincerely,
Ray Ingles (248) 377-7735 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anagrams of "FANUC Robotics":
baton of circus curb not fiasco crab of suction count for basic
stoic cobra fun torn cubic oafs surf in tobacco of arctic bonus
so count fabric brain of stucco
