-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Paul Nathan Puri wrote:
> I have pine .debs if anyone wants them, let me know. I post them to my > web site or email them to you, however you like. > > I was running mutt. But I have a soft spot for pine. It was the first > email app I ever learned back in 92 when I started college. I realize > that it is not GPL. But if you want them, I'll be glad to post 'em or > email 'em. It's pine.deb, pico.deb (a great text editor), and pilot.deb. The reason Debian doesn't distribute Pine debs is not because it's non-gpl. It's because the license forbids distribution of modified binaries. If you've applied the debian diff patches to the source before you made the .debs then you're violating the Pine license agreement. If you haven't modified the sources, then you're OK with the pine license, but your .deb probably doesn't follow the Debian guidlines. noah PGP public key available at http://lynx.dac.neu.edu/home/httpd/n/nmeyerha/mail.html or by 'finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED]' This message was composed in a 100% Microsoft free environment. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNtSiAIdCcpBjGWoFAQE3xAP+Ox8S0HTMUwPQlMM83uL1ZE4xR2iMMhv9 1v6Jwn3ZPTyLBNUq03I7b4wy1HLOKaSQY+f3BmQdVqEf47jSmmES52fyKIEgdxX4 MAKDYmlMLInetJ8xC5InwhSf8Zl87pTXJLlXkhYLvKiOoo6l79Aw1QVbpQ30NDwD EZ9uYHVF7Q8= =W6TJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
