Henning Makholm writes:

> If that's the only problem, then why not simply
> 
> 1. keep the Debian development structure as it is.
> 
> 2. someone who cares about it forms a company that produces CDs from
>    the official CD immages and markets them, shrink-wrapped and with
>    lots of pomp, circumstance and generally commercial gestures.
> 
> 3. if the company makes a profit, then congratulations to those who
>    put money into it at the beginning. They might want to contribute
>    some of it to the Debian project (c/o SPI).
> 
> 4. if the company finds it will be good for marketing to have this
>    or that gadget which is not currently packaged, they'd hire a
>    programmer to package (and possibly develop) it - that programmer
>    would register as a Debian developer and have his usual say in
>    Debian matters.
> 
> Nothing of this needs any formal decision on behalf of the Debian
> project itself. The free software nature of Debian has always
> encouraged this sort of things. All it takes is for some people to
> get together and raise enough initial capital for producing the
> first round of CDs and lanuch the initial marketing boost.

I like this idea a lot.  It would be similar to what Cygnus is doing
with the GNU development tools, this didn't affect the way the FSF
operates either.  Such a company could also offer support for debian.
I think support is wat will get debian into companies, and make it more
mainstream.  If you feel that is important/interesting to you, there
really is nothing in the DFSG that would stop you from doing it.

Eric Meijer

-- 
 E.L. Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])          | tel. office +31 40 2472189
 Eindhoven Univ. of Technology             | tel. lab.   +31 40 2475032
 Lab. for Catalysis and Inorg. Chem. (TAK) | tel. fax    +31 40 2455054

Reply via email to