Actually, kernel-package and make-kpkg did a good job of getting
kernel 2.1.132 installed here. The way these kernels are going into
/boot is a good thing, too, IMO, although I needed to make link
afterward ( but maybe I only had to do that because I made a mistake
with this system in the past?).
Bob, you've guided me well with your suggestions since I first
joined this list. Thanks for being there. <g>
Art
On Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 06:26:07PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> Does 'make install' put vmlinuz where lilo expects it to be? You might
> install kernel-package and use 'make-kpkg' to compile the kernel and
> create a .deb which you can install. This works quite nicely.
>
> Bob
>
> On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Tom wrote:
>
> > I am trying to upgrade from 2.0.36 to 2.1.125. After configuring with
> > "make xconfig" I run "make install". At the end I run lilo. Everything
> > seems fine, but when I reboot I am still in 2.0.36. I tried some
> > variations. I ran "make dep", and saw no error messages. I tried
> > compiling a 486 kernel as well as pentium. My board is a AMD 586 133.
> > The only unusual thing is this. Prior to installing the 2.1.125 package
> > I had accidently deleted everything in /usr/src. I untared the source
> > there and created /usr/src/linux as a symbolic link to
> > /usr/src/kernel-source-2.1.124. But I am not having trouble compiling
> > so I don't think this is a problem. I am not sure how to track down
> > what the problem is. Any advice or suggestions are appreciated.
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
> >
> >
>
> ----
> Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DM42nh http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
