On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 03:29:37PM -0500, Ed Cogburn wrote:
>       Considering what I hear from this group and the 'debates' in c.o.l.a., 
> and elsewhere on the Net, WinNT isn't that stable as it is now.  If they
> really are going to break compatibility with their predecessor OSs then
> that will change things, but I'm astonished that they would actually do
> that.  After all, the whole world didn't rush out and upgrade from Win95
> to Win98, and this upgrade was supposed to be compatible.  A lot of
> people have decided Win95 is enough.  If they leave compatibility out,
> M$ runs a risk of having Win2k not being a big seller.  Its the
> compatibility issue that has allowed them to drag everybody along the
> upgrade path, a real money maker, all this time.

Windows NT 4 is reasonably stable in that the whole operating
system rarely crashes; it's still more often than Linux,
but a lot less often than 95. The GUI still crashes on occasion.

To me, the main reason for not upgrading to 98 is that there aren't
any new features which I want. You can get the new desktop
by putting IE 4 on 95 (and I don't want it anyway). I don't use USB
and you can get that on 95 anyway (my notebook has it). So there's no reason
to upgrade, since I rarely use 95 anyway.

NT could do with some upgrades, though -- it needs to become more
mainstream to get better driver support. It needs DirectX 5 or better
(then I'd never need to use 95 at all on my desktop).

>       Finally, one the important things about Linux is its configurability,
> especially being able to trim the kernel to just what is needed.  The
> idea that they can build an OS that is not only good at being a
> mainstream desktop OS while at the same time as being a strong
> enterprise server, all from the same shrink-wrapped box, smells real
> funny to me.

Isn't that what we do too?
And RedHat?


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3TYD              [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.   http://hamish.home.ml.org

Reply via email to