On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 10:24:32 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Amanda Shuler wrote:
> > How do I get around this?
[I don't have the original message to reply to - in any case, dpkg installs
the PAM packages just fine when given them in one go:
dpkg -i libpam0g*deb libpam0g-util*deb]
> > Is this a bug?
> I would say yes.
No. There is nothing wrong with cyclic dependencies.
> If you could file a bug report, it would be most appreciated.
In this case it wouldn't be. This has already been reported earlier (#20660,
#25330) and is marked as Severity: fixed (as it is a non-bug, but as
non-maintainer I cannot close it).
Ray
--
UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried
to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY,
UNDERHAND and JUST LUCKY I GUESS.
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
