I needed to change an option compiled into speak-freely.deb,
Script started on Tue Aug 11 21:28:49 1998
Here's the trimmed output of what I tried, and the resulting
error message I got.
--------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# dpkg-source -x ~blunier/speak-freely_6.1c-4.dsc
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("blunier") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 24.
dpkg-source: extracting speak-freely in speak-freely-6.1c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# cd speak-freely-6.1c/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/speak-freely-6.1c# dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("blunier") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 24.
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("blunier") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 24.
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is speak-freely
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("blunier") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 24.
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("blunier") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 24.
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 6.1c-4
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("blunier") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 24.
.
.
.
no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("blunier") at
/usr/lib/dpkg/controllib.pl line 24.
dpkg-source: building speak-freely using existing speak-freely_6.1c.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building speak-freely in speak-freely_6.1c-4.diff.gz
dpkg-source: building speak-freely in speak-freely_6.1c-4.dsc
debian/rules build
touch preserve-stamp
touch makefile-stamp
make
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/speak-freely-6.1c'
cc -O2 -g -Iadpcm -Ilpc -I/usr/include/gsm -Imd5 -Iidea -Ilibdes
-DInternet_Port=2074 -DHALF_DUPLEX -O3 -DLINUX -c speaker.c -o speaker.o
In file included from speaker.c:10:
speakfree.h:64: gsm.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [speaker.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/speak-freely-6.1c'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/speak-freely-6.1c# exit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Is this the proper way to generate a .deb package from source,
or it there some other problem here?
Mark W. Blunier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
