Hi... Ummmm, that looks interesting. I don't think Linux's IP-masq system supports that.
Alex On Fri, 17 Jul 1998, George Bonser wrote: > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 12:16:03 -0700 (PDT) > From: George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: NAT > Resent-Date: 17 Jul 1998 19:16:12 -0000 > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ; > > > This is a question about network address translation, not IP-Masquerading. > Has anyone ever done this and if so, can you point me to the documents? > > Here is the situation. I have a subnet where I want to masquerade the > network but not the host part of the address. 192.168.0.45 might turn > into 10.0.0.45. The purpose is to allow a third network to talk to hosts > on a two other networks that are using identical address space. I want to > translate one of the networks so the third will see it as different and > route data to it correctly. > > 10.0.1.x --------- Linux Box1 --------192.168.0.x > > > 10.0.2.x---- ------Linux Box2 --------192.168.0.x > > I can not use IP masquerading because I do not want all of the hosts to > appear as the IP address of the Linux box, I just want to translate the > network address so I can still address each box directly from the 10 net. > > > Has anyone ever done this before? > > > George Bonser > > Microsoft! Which end of the stick do you want today? > > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > > -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
