Tom Malloy wrote:

<snip>But there is just no reason or justification for organizing configuration 
files
in this confusing and intimidating manner. Applications, and os's, should be 
usable
and reasonably configurably at every level of userability.<snip>

Well then, if that's what you want then get KDE or something. It's a lot of 
work to
make a 'reasonably configurable' window manager, and maybe the FVWM2 guys don't 
have
the time, or don't care. They made something they like, and made it free to use 
for
whoever wants to download it or get a cd with it. If you don't like that, get
something else. I get frustrated with hamm sometimes because setting up ANY 
piece of
hardware has been ten times the pain I've had with my extensive Windows 
experience, at
least this has been my personal experience with Debian, maybe some of you have 
had an
easier time for all I know.

If you like the leaness and meaness of FVWM2, you'll have to learn it's mean
configuration system. You might like this sight: http://www.PLiG.org/xwinman/

It contains screenshots and configuration files for the screenshots for nearly 
all of
the popular window managers.

I personally am using KDE right now. I'd say it ties with windowmaker and gnome 
used
together, which is what I used before. Windowmaker and gnome w/ rxvt is 
prettier than
KDE but I find with the K environment I can do pretty much anything instantly 
and in a
number of different ways to. And the 1.0 release of KDE was announced today to, 
so it
should be packaged for Debian Real Soon Now and you should definately check it 
out if
you haven't already. The online help and configuration is even easier to use 
than
Windows, IMHO.

Chris


--  
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Reply via email to