-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 May 1998 19:21:06 +0000, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
>The .deb is proprietary to Debian. =3Dp The installation and removal scri=
^^^^
Any particular reason you have Quoted Printable on?
>Do you remember a release of bash that made it in to unstable not long ago?=
No. I dislike bash and don't use it.
>In the same circumstances, would I have been able to do that with a slp
>file? Likely not. Probably not.
And neither you or I can answer that question. I have found out what the
problem with this thread is. Most people are taking it as a religious
affront. Look, use whatever slings your dingy, alright? But let's keep a
few things grounded in fact.
1: SLP is beta, as is the rest of Stampede. How fun was DEB in its infancy.
IIRC DEB was not always an ar archive of tars.
2: What I am talking about is the ideal that SLP presents, not the technical
nitty gritty. Take that elsewhere. If you want to argue technical nitty
gritty let's remember that I am on the Debian mailing list because, guess
what, I *RUN* Debian. I guess that means, at the core of it, on the day to
day operations, I must agree with the format, huh?
3: No one should ever get so religious about any topic that they are
automatically closed to new ideas and ideals. No one.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBNWcke3pf7K2LbpnFEQJHpwCbBxO+WFPZPPIRlTcG9Xk+NP8ffqIAn1S6
uymODERRyjbLdD9+st2GEIIo
=hPvy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
