On Sat, 23 May 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 1998, Ionut Borcoman at musa wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Unfortunately, I've panicked and reinstalled all Win95. Fortunately, all
> > my personal data and files are on a different partition (sda5 and sda6)
> > so nothing important was lost, excepting my time and yours. With this
> > occasion I have also changed sda1 from FAT32 to VFAT as my newly 2.0.33
> > kernel didn't recognize it. Any idea about this ? The original kernel
> > that come with hamm had had no problem to mount that partition.
>
> If you downloaded it not in .deb form, the patch for FAT32 support is not
> included... The .deb version does... I had to figure that out about 3
> weeks ago..
>
I would really suggest not using .deb kernels. The reason they have FAT32
support is because they are just the standard default bins. They are not
configured to run on your system. They therefore are not very high
performance. They usually take up way too much memory because they include
all kinds of things you probably dont even have. It is always good to
compile your own kernels. Try it, you'll find it makes a HUGE difference.
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
