Henrique de Moraes Holschuh said: > Unless you're talking about the VERY old cyrus 1.5, I object very heavily > to your comment, I had uploads and backports for Cyrus 2.1 done some hours > after the bug was announced on bugtraq... >
yes, but until its fixed in stable, and announced on security.debian.org it's not official. and yes I am using 1.5. I do not run testing or unstable ANYWHERE. >> another downside to cyrus in debian woody is its very old(probably 3-4 >> years old). Debian unstable has a newer version of cyrus(never tried >> it). > > I suggest you do so :-) > > There's an official Woody backport at http://people.debian.org/~hmh/ cool, I'll look into it! nate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
