On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, C.J.LAWSON wrote: > Well for what it is worth my own opinion is that 95 just like its forbears > is an app. loaded on dos and for this reason I think we should be talking > about whether or not dos is a true multi-tasking OS ... It certainly is > capable of becoming one. The question is, has it be implemented?
Ever try Windows '98? Well, if you haven't, don't count on M$ ever learning how to design a real operating system. Yesterday I heard a commercial on the radio about Win98 being the OS of future businesses... Win98 runs one hell of a lot slower than Win95 and multitasks even worse.. I don't know where M$ came up with Win98 running programs faster than Win95.. Win98 is a disaster; _never_ install it, it is a complete waste of time and money. Maybe Gates should fire all the so-called programmers and hire a few monkeys to get the job done! <I guess that comment was a little harsh, but necessay to get the point across> -Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
